Investor claims / Topic guide
FINRA Broker Arb
Explore the brokerage relationship, the rules, and the records that matter.
Identify the relationship before the rule
FINRA Rule 12200 describes conditions for customer arbitration involving members or associated persons and specified business-related disputes. Whether those conditions are met requires review of the actual parties and circumstances. A product name, an account loss, or a person’s country of residence alone does not resolve the analysis.
Gather the account agreement and statements identifying the relevant entities. Keep the role of each participant clear: who made a recommendation, received an instruction, or responded to a concern? Mark your understanding separately from facts established by documents.
Prepare a traceable investor file
Create a short chronology with a source beside each event. Preserve complete communications and original records rather than selecting only favorable excerpts. Explain the concern in plain language and leave damages analysis to an appropriate professional review.
The FINRA preparation article also explains why the eligibility period in Rule 12206 must not be treated as a universal limitation period. Obtain prompt advice about dates; a website inquiry or informal complaint should not be assumed to preserve rights.
Know which questions belong together
Where a class-action notice concerns similar conduct, read the Class Action Broker Arbitration guide and have the documents reviewed together. Do not make participation or exclusion decisions from a general comparison alone.
Once a forum is identified, ask about representation, the panel-selection process, costs, and communication. The Broker Arb Panels page focuses on disclosures and process rather than predicting outcomes from biographies. BrokerArb.com is not affiliated with FINRA and does not file claims, contact neutrals, or provide a customer portal. Readers outside the United States should obtain advice addressing the relevant cross-border facts and legal systems rather than assuming these U.S. materials govern their dispute.